大宅门1912

特朗普掀了金正恩核底牌，朝鲜10多枚导弹回应，深圳会面要黄了？,兵器观世界,原创 特朗普掀了金正恩核底牌，朝鲜10多枚导弹回应，深圳会面要黄了？_我的网站

一 |     "The accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO constitutes a test of loyalty to the western bloc, in particular to the US and Great Britain, which are the real geopolitical and geostrategic beneficiaries of the ongoing conflict," said Dr. Tiberio Graziani, chairman of Vision & Global Trends International Institute for Global Analyses.,The two Nordic countries' neutrality differs. Sweden had not joined a military alliance or participated in any war since 1814, with its neutrality being flexible, self-declared and not enshrined in law, as the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars noted in its 2 February 2022 study.,In contrast, Finland's neutrality was stipulated by the Paris Peace Treaty of 1947 which was signed after the end of the Second World War between the Allied powers - including the USSR, the UK, the US and France - and former Nazi Germany allies, such as Italy, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and Finland.,"This definitely appears to be a violation of Finland’s international agreements signed after WWII with the Soviet Union then later Russia," said Earl Rasmussen, executive vice-president of Eurasia Group, citing the 1947 treaty as well as the 1992 Russo-Finnish treaty.,It raises questions as to whether benefits from the abandoned neutrality will outweigh potential security risks for the two Nordic states.,"I am puzzled by how this inclusion will provide increased security, it appears it will likely further deteriorate relations between Russia and the EU and more specifically with Finland and Sweden," Rasmussen said. "Strategically, I am not sure what the real impact will be. Essentially, both Finland and Sweden are de facto NATO members to include coordination and joint exercises. However, tensions will likely increase and increased defensive measures will likely occur in Russia’s northern regions as well as Kaliningrad.",Why Finland & Sweden’s NATO Admission Is So Important to the US16 May, 19:17 GMT,What Do Finns and Swedes Think About NATO Membership?,Meanwhile, popular support for NATO membership in both Nordic states has never been high.,According to a 2021 poll commissioned by EVA Finnish Business and Policy Forum, around 26% of Finns were in favor of joining NATO, 40% against and 33% remained undecided. A January 2022 Demoskop survey showed 42% of Swedes supporting NATO accession and 37% of respondents opposed it.,The Russian special operation in Ukraine is said to have invigorated NATO proponents in both Nordic countries. Rasmussen noted that recent surveys in Finland have shown a spike in support up to 76%. However, in Sweden, support to join NATO has remained relatively low, climbing to just 47%, according to him.,Meanwhile, unlike Sweden, Finland shares a 1,340 km (830 mi) border with Russia and has maintained longstanding economic relations with Moscow for decades. As of 2019, Finland imported around 60% of its energy from Russia with the latter being the fourth largest importer of Finnish goods in 2017, according to the Wilson Center. Furthermore, Russian speakers constitute the third largest ethnic group in the Nordic country.,Putin: If NATO Infrastructure is Deployed to Finland & Sweden, Russia Will Respond in ‘Mirror Way’01:02 GMT,"Even during the Cold War, both states were neutral and non-NATO members, with Finland developing strong economic and trade relations with Russia," the Eurasia Group vice-president explained. "As trade degrades and energy sharing diminishes there will likely be a strain placed on the economies, mostly with Finland.",Moscow has repeatedly underscored that Russia harbors no hostile intentions against either Nordic country, yet also signaling that the latest NATO expansion will not make the continent more stable or secure. Earlier this week, Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasized that the Kremlin has "nothing that could worry us in terms of Finland or Sweden's membership in NATO," adding, however, that if military equipment or troops are deployed along the border, Moscow will have to "respond in a mirror manner and create the same threats in the territories from which they threaten us.",There is yet another controversy surrounding Sweden and Finland's accession to the western military bloc: neither Nordic state has held a popular referendum to find out whether the public has really weighed all the pros and cons of NATO membership.,"Political leadership in both countries is taking a certain degree of risk to push forward the joining without a public referendum," Rasmussen said. "I am sure Washington and Brussels realize that risk.",In addition to that, NATO accession may increase political polarization in both Nordic states, according to the Eurasia Group vice-president. In particular, "the Finnish government is made up of several political parties with no single party having a clear majority, hence requiring partnerships being established," he noted, adding that worsening economic conditions could "potentially create divisions politically and thus alignments could easily change.",Meanwhile, the Swedish left has lashed out at the government and the Social Democrats over Stockholm's NATO admission deal with Ankara. According to Expressen, the Greens and the Left Party are mooting a no-confidence vote against Foreign Minister Ann Linde.,Bank of England Head: UK To Face More Inflation Than Other Major Economies10:47 GMT,Why NATO's 2% Requirement Appears Unrealistic Today,NATO rules may trigger further controversy as they will require Sweden and Finland to spend 2% of gross domestic product (GDP) on their defense budgets. Even though the Nordic countries have committed to reaching the benchmark by 2024, the long-term viability of their promises is in question, given skyrocketing inflation in Europe.,Inflation in Finland has recently risen to its highest level in over 30 years, hitting 7.1% in May. In April, the country's consumer price index (CPI), a popular gauge for inflation, stood at 5.7%, according to Statistics Finland.,Likewise, annual inflation in Sweden jumped from 6.4% in April to 7.3% in May, according to the country's Consumer Price Index with fixed interest rate (CPIF).,"To this end, just as the Ukrainian people are sacrificed, so the economies of European countries will be sacrificed, including Finland and Sweden," forecast Graziani. "Very difficult economic and social months await us in Europe. It will be a very hot autumn. Political crises in various countries of the European Union are likely to be hypothesized.",EU member states, the UK and the US are taking efforts to tame galloping inflation which throws their capability of adhering to NATO requirements into question. To complicate matters further, the UK is calling to step up funding and arming of Ukraine "until victory" amid the Russian special operation.,"The US and UK are using the conflict in Ukraine to pressure greater EU involvement and support to include NATO contributions," said Rasmussen. "While it is being projected that member states will meet their 2% objectives by 2024, based on developing economic conditions and a pending recession, I question the realism of that projection. Increasing real contributions for defense along with rising tensions between the EU and Russia may prove challenging as economic conditions worsen resulting in political disruptions across Europe.",Meanwhile, the US is not in its best shape either, according to Rasmussen. The country steadily moves forward into a potentially deep recession; increased tensions with China; emerging challenges in Latin America; tensions with Iran; and economic challenges at home. The scholar believes that it is likely one will see a major political change in the US in 2022 midterms, in 2024 and beyond.,What’s more, as the Republican Party becomes increasingly influenced by MAGA supporters, Trump's skepticism towards the NATO alliance may get a second wind in 2024. And this raises further questions about the future of the Cold War-era military bloc.。    看来，美总统特朗普这次是真急了，接连对朝释放对话信号！    8月19日，特朗普对外表示，他预计今年11月份在深圳APEC 峰会期间会见朝鲜领导人金正恩。

二 |     而当有人问到会不会和金正恩谈无核化，他直接跳过问题：“我不想谈那个。但我和金正恩保持着良好关系。

三 | ”    可转头，他就罕见支出，“金正恩拥有57枚非常强大的核武器”，还说这本来就不该发生。这是特朗普第一次把朝鲜核弹头数量说得这么具体。    但就在同一天，韩国国防部长安圭伯称，韩国民间机构普遍估算朝鲜有80到120枚核武器，特朗普说的57枚“存在差异”。

四 |         当然，安圭伯也承认，情报有限，谁也说不出准确数字，军方评估属于韩美机密不能公开。    那么， 57这个数字到底怎么来的？特朗普没讲，他就是要让新闻标题好看，让选民觉得这总统对美国掌握得清清楚楚。    正如他所表达的，“他是聪明的总统，换作愚蠢的总统就出事了。”也就是说，他认为，没有他，朝鲜早就打起来了。    一个大国的总统，把没开战当成自己的政绩挂在嘴边，这说明他手里已经没什么牌可打了。    特朗普为什么挑这个时候爆料？    中期选举还剩不到三个月。

五 | 美军在中东陷在消耗战里拔不出来，伊朗硬扛着不低头。特朗普急需一份能摆上台面的外交成绩单，翻来翻去只有“特金会”这张旧牌。

六 |     哪怕朝鲜根本没承诺任何新东西，哪怕河内峰会那年闹得不欢而散，他还是要试。

七 |         前几日宣布缩减美韩军演，发条帖子的事儿成本几乎为零，不用过国会，不用花预算。而给朝鲜递话的成本也不高，动动嘴皮子就行。

八 |     对于特朗普的说法，朝鲜方面当天就给出了回应。    朝鲜最高领导人金正恩胞妹金与正发声明，说对特朗普提到的朝美沟通完全不知情，但同时又强调了，金正恩对特朗普“怀有好的回忆”。    这番表态等于告诉美国：官方渠道我们不认，但私人交情可以留个口子。    金与正名义上是劳动党中央副部长，实际就是金正恩的代言人。

九 | 她没把门关死，说明平壤也在等华盛顿下一步的条件。    特朗普想拿“我们关系好”当筹码，金正恩那边不拒绝也不接招，只是把球轻轻踢了回来。    但朝鲜的动作比语言更直接。

十 |     20日下午5点左右，韩国军方侦测到朝鲜从平壤一带向东部海域一口气发射了10多枚短程弹道导弹，飞行距离超过300公里。这是8月以来第三次发射，前两次各打了一枚，这次直接翻十倍。

十一 |         这也是告诉各方：半岛事务的主导权不在美韩，朝鲜自己才是关键。    从河内到深圳，美朝之间的死结其实一直没变。特朗普想要的是外交场面和金正恩的握手照片，金正恩要的是制裁松动、国际承认和安全保证。    57枚也好，80到120枚也罢，数字本身不解决任何问题。

十二 | 朝鲜这次用十枚导弹把话说白了：几句话和一次缩水军演，换不来朝鲜放下筹码。

十三 |     APEC今年11月18到19日在深圳办，中国是东道主。美国过去谈朝核总想绕开中国，现在却想借中国主场捞见面机会。这不等于中国会去当中间人。

十四 |         外交部发言人只回了一句“不掌握具体信息，不作评论”。

十五 | 意思很明确：美朝关系我们不掺和。

十六 |     说白了，特朗普这轮操作，本质上还是一场政治秀。未来半岛局势的关键，其实不在于一次峰会能不能开成，而在于各方能不能转向建立可持续的危机管理机制。

十七 |     半岛问题的死结从来不在于见不见面，而在于见面后能不能谈成实际成果。特朗普不肯松动制裁，金正恩不肯先弃核，想谈成很难。    朝鲜核武库扩大，导弹发射频次上升，韩美军演缩减但没停……现在的半岛局势显然更复杂。特朗普想靠私人关系压住这一摊，几乎不可能。返回，查看更多。

Current article:http://n05hw4.ningshunsaotuiqiao.shop/news/20260826_266.html

Published on:03:16:26